Help
-
Search
-
Members
-
Calendar
Full Version:
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
The LawBiz® Forum
>
Ed Poll's Vault - A repository of Ed's Intellectual Property
>
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
Pages:
1
,
2
Coming soon: the true 'corporate' law firm?
(0 replies)
Put off a succession plan at your peril
(0 replies)
Succession plan a must for solo practitioners
(0 replies)
The right rent for you
(0 replies)
All the right moves?
(0 replies)
Not every new client is a good client
(0 replies)
Ignore the new reality at your peril
(0 replies)
There’s more than one way to add a lawyer
(0 replies)
Who owns knowledge?
(0 replies)
Assessing your practice’s retirement value
(0 replies)
Don’t procrastinate, prioritize — and get help
(0 replies)
Law school rankings just a numbers game
(0 replies)
Making Alternative Billing a Marketing Tool
(0 replies)
Taking a Glance at the Dashboard
(0 replies)
Outdated Concepts of the Guild
(0 replies)
Does Your Firm Have a Language Gap?
(0 replies)
Breeding Excellence
(0 replies)
Taking advantage of an unprecedented opportunity
(0 replies)
Do you have the time?
(0 replies)
Origination credit and original sin
(0 replies)
Taming the Client Record Beast
(0 replies)
What is dominance worth to you?
(0 replies)
Big Brother and Bar Associations
(0 replies)
Revisiting Client Lisits
(0 replies)
Limited scope representation: half a case may be better than none
(0 replies)
Where will the money come from?
(0 replies)
How to get from plan to action
(0 replies)
Where to draw the ethical line?
(0 replies)
Can you really raise your rates in 2010?
(0 replies)
Determine your profitability to assess your worth
(0 replies)
How lawyers think lawyers should be trained
(0 replies)
Bringing specialist training to the 21st century legal market
(0 replies)
Pro bono internships done right
(0 replies)
To compete with legal self-help sites, unbundling may be key
(0 replies)
What's in a name?
(0 replies)
A collaborative approach to staffing
(0 replies)
Coming soon: the true 'corporate' law firm?
(0 replies)
It's not what's up front that counts
(0 replies)
Hit 'em where they ain't
(0 replies)
Marketing 101 reminders
(0 replies)
Determine your profitability to assess your worth
(0 replies)
How lawyers think lawyers should be trained
(0 replies)
Bringing specialist training to the 21st century legal market
(0 replies)
Pro bono internships done right
(0 replies)
Does networking still require real people?
(0 replies)
Are a law practice and a law office synonymous?
(0 replies)
In a recession, have tickets, will travel?
(0 replies)
Doctors, lawyers and the importance of ownership
(0 replies)
To charge or not to charge
(0 replies)
Small firms can find diamonds in a rough recession
(0 replies)
Lawyers should be retrained, not cut loose
(0 replies)
Ignore the business of law at your peril
(0 replies)
Can you afford to do good?
(0 replies)
Learning to be a lawyer
(0 replies)
How is your practice going? Ask your clients
(0 replies)
Senior lawyers may hold a valuable commodity
(0 replies)
Helping profession should do just that for troubled members
(0 replies)
Partnership in law extends to lawyer-client relationship
(0 replies)
Transition from big to small firm calls up one's entrepreneurialism
(0 replies)
Life may be unfair, but layoffs need not be
(0 replies)
Leaving firm, lawyer wise do a full accounting
(0 replies)
Worry not about losing clients; just work to keep them
(0 replies)
When the going gets tough for law firms...
(0 replies)
Arrogance of attorneys, others a troubling societal development
(0 replies)
How to stay off list of endangered professional species
(0 replies)
Experience as owners could be boon for small-firm practitioners
(0 replies)
For firm's sake, partners may have to part with cash
(0 replies)
Brevity is not the soul of good client billing
(0 replies)
Costs plus billable hours have to equal revenue
(0 replies)
Lawyers Can't Make More Than Their Firms Do
(0 replies)
Look at partnership with open eyes
(0 replies)
When defining value, the question is: value for whom?
(0 replies)
One firm's recession is another's depression
(0 replies)
The market and malpractice insurance
(0 replies)
Do you want to sell out?
(0 replies)
Can't we all just get along?
(0 replies)
Some breathing room on an IOLTA dilemma
(0 replies)
Marketing: it's an effort, not a strategy
(0 replies)
Cutting overhead can be painful procedure
(0 replies)
Do you realize how much you're billing?
(0 replies)
Take care of time, and it will take care of you
(0 replies)
Are you cheap... or reasonable?
(0 replies)
No firm is too big to fail
(0 replies)
Growing up SMART
(0 replies)
Know the ROI on your IT
(0 replies)
Recession survival is three-part cycle
(0 replies)
When the coach runs the plays
(0 replies)
Are you engaged in 'civil' practice?
(0 replies)
Cold calling redux: how bar counsel missed the point
(0 replies)
Why no one dreams of becoming managing partner
(0 replies)
A law firm model that gives clients what they really want
(0 replies)
The bottom line on the cost of associate loyalty
(0 replies)
A status report on loyalty
(0 replies)
There are some things a lawyer can guarantee
(0 replies)
To retain or not to retain: that's the question for clients
(0 replies)
Facing reality when a firm's survival is at stake
(0 replies)
The taxing matter of taxing legal services
(0 replies)
How to break the ice with 'cold calling'
(0 replies)
When posting to social network, be sure to use 'sharer' discretion
(0 replies)
As workload increases, so should fees
(0 replies)
Clients may not buy when firm brands its attorneys as 'products'
(0 replies)
Are you in the 'red zone'?
(0 replies)
Do as we say, not as we do
(0 replies)
He ain't heavy, he's my client
(0 replies)
The billable hour trap
(0 replies)
'I want to thank all the little people ...'
(0 replies)
The SMART way to do marketing
(0 replies)
Risky business: lawyers and insurance ethics
(0 replies)
Would a recession be legal?
(0 replies)
How do you sue a client? Very carefully!
(0 replies)
Corporate America's challenge to 'big law'
(0 replies)
Got 'the billable-hour blues'?
(0 replies)
Lawyers are not immortal
(0 replies)
Money or justice: must we choose?
(0 replies)
After hiring associates, help grow them!
(0 replies)
Are you afraid of ghosts?
(0 replies)
Is loyalty cheap?
(0 replies)
It's better to work with a Net
(0 replies)
An update on the score
(0 replies)
Preparing for the 'second season'
(0 replies)
How to use financial software
(0 replies)
Top 10 technology recommendations for 2008
(0 replies)
Will you avoid the 'credit crunch'?
(0 replies)
Bill confidently, even in tough times
(0 replies)
Collaboration needed in this '2.0' world
(0 replies)
Practice 'business' to practice success
(0 replies)
Build your business with common sense
(0 replies)
Office choices speak louder than words
(0 replies)
Money main issue for would-be solos
(0 replies)
Do you know when it's time to leave?
(0 replies)
Age policy may force more than retirement
(0 replies)
Trade shows offer one-stop marketing
(0 replies)
Collections depend on collection policy
(0 replies)
Firm support makes rainmaking easier
(0 replies)
'Exceeding' expectations not always the best plan
(0 replies)
You need to do well to do good
(0 replies)
Why non-engagement letters are helpful (Part Two)
(0 replies)
Why non-engagement letters are helpful (Part One)
(0 replies)
Master the 'art' of setting fees
(0 replies)
New practice tips to ensure success
(0 replies)
Technology, timing speed up payments
(0 replies)
Type ethically: you are what you blog
(0 replies)
Digging out of the discounting hole
(0 replies)
Does a lawyer need an MBA?
(0 replies)
Hey partner, are you sure you're tenured?
(0 replies)
Demonstrate how you provide value
(0 replies)
Do you know how you rate?
(0 replies)
'Productizing' a law practice adds value
(0 replies)
The 'perfect bill' prompts pay, goodwill
(0 replies)
Hanging a shingle on a 'shoestring'
(0 replies)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here
.